Skip to content
MOGanja

MOGanja

Missouri dispensary menus, prices, and cannabis data

This site contains information about cannabis products. You must be 21 years of age or older to enter.

No, Take Me Back

By entering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

MOGanjaMOGanja

Who owns Missouri cannabis? What 490 state licenses show about market concentration

On paper, 154 companies run the state's 221 operating dispensaries. Follow the contact numbers on their licenses and the count of independently filed licenses drops to 33.

MOGanja Intelligence · July 28, 2026 · Licensing data as of July 20, 2026

On paper, Missouri's 221 dispensaries approved to operate — "operating dispensaries" throughout this piece — belong to 154 different companies, and 126 of those companies run exactly one store. That reads like a market of independents.

Follow the contact numbers on the state licenses and the picture changes. Group licenses by the phone number filed with the Division of Cannabis Regulation, and those 221 dispensaries collapse to 64 owner groups. One contact number alone appears on the licenses behind 37 dispensaries, held through 27 differently named LLCs. That is one licensing network behind 16.7 percent of every operating dispensary in the state.

A shared licensing contact is not proof of common legal ownership. It can mean one owner, one investor group, or one consultant filing for many clients. But it is the strongest connective signal in the public record, and by that signal, dispensaries with a genuinely independent license file hold just 33 of Missouri's 221 locations.

Two ways to count the same market

Missouri's licensing file lists 490 cannabis licenses held by 368 named entities. Counting dispensary ownership conservatively, by exact entity name, multi-location operators hold 95 of the 221 operating stores, or 43 percent.

Counting by shared licensing contact instead, multi-location networks hold 188 of 221 stores, or 85 percent. The truth sits between those two numbers, and both are worth knowing: the paper count is what the license file claims, the grouped count is what the contact records suggest.

Who holds the 221 operating dispensary locations

Conservative = grouped by exact entity name. Grouped = licenses sharing a contact number counted as one owner.

The micro program is not launching

Missouri built a microbusiness license category to lower the barrier for small operators. The approval numbers say it is not working. Two of 17 micro-dispensary licenses are approved to operate, along with 5 of 55 micro-wholesale licenses. Every other license category clears 79 percent approval; standard dispensaries clear 97 percent.

Whatever the cause, capital requirements, regulatory burden, or market viability, the program designed to create small independent operators is producing almost none while the contact-number networks above keep consolidating the standard market.

Share of licenses approved to operate, by license type

Micro categories vs. the rest of the program.

Where the stores are, and where they are not

Kansas City and St. Louis together hold 42 dispensaries, 19 percent of the state's total, and the top seven cities hold 75. DCR records place operating dispensaries in 55 Missouri counties. Missouri has 114 counties plus the independent city of St. Louis, which leaves the majority of the state's counties without a single operating dispensary.

Fifteen counties host a licensed cannabis facility, a cultivator or manufacturer, with no operating dispensary at all: cannabis is grown or processed there, but cannot be bought there.

Operating dispensaries in the top seven cities

The ratings floor is high

One more thing the public record shows, from Google profile data: Missouri dispensary customers rate their stores well. The 221 operating dispensaries average 4.74 stars, 122 of them sit at 4.8 or above, and the lowest rated store in the state holds a 4.3. Among cities with five or more rated stores, Columbia leads at 4.79 and Springfield trails at 4.53.

For operators, that is a warning about differentiation: when nearly everyone holds 4.6 or better, a good rating is table stakes, not an edge.

What this means for operators

First, know who you are actually competing with. The store across town with a different name on the door may share a licensing network — and possibly the ownership, buying power, and playbook that come with one — with a dozen others. The license file is public; the connections are visible to anyone who groups it.

Second, the geography is not saturated evenly. The metros are crowded while most counties have no store at all, and 15 counties already host supply-side infrastructure with no retail. For an operator weighing a second location, the license map matters more than the population map alone.

Third, if the micro program stays frozen, the independent share of this market shrinks by default. The 33 genuinely single-file operators are the exception in Missouri cannabis, not the rule.

How we calculated this

  • Missouri DCR licensing data current as of July 20, 2026 (rendered from the live database at page build).
  • Source: Missouri Division of Cannabis Regulation facility licensing records (490 licenses), synced weekly into MOGanja's database. Ratings come from public Google profile data enriched July 15, 2026, and are labeled as such.
  • Ownership grouping: the conservative count groups licenses by exact entity name; the grouped count clusters licenses that share a contact phone number (digits normalized) in DCR filings. A shared contact number indicates a shared licensing network, not proven common legal ownership. Both counts are shown.
  • County figures count counties named in DCR records; Missouri's 114 counties plus the independent city of St. Louis is a public geographic constant. No growth-over-time claims appear in this article because the database's record-creation dates reflect when MOGanja began tracking (March 2026), not when licenses were issued.
  • Every number traces to a recorded query in docs/analysis-article-1-queries.md in the MOGanja repository. Menu data is not used in this article.